Navigate
Advertise here

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.051. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) is faster at 5.20s vs 10.05s, with pass rates of 54.5% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#194
Total Output Tokens
26,286
Response Time (avg)
5.20s
Total Cost
$0.051
Rank
#199
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.05s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model GPT-5.6 Luna (low)

It has the best score here (6.2), while responding about 1.9x faster than Qwen3.7 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #194 #199
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 54.5% 36.4%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.437 0.262
Total Cost $0.051 $0.019
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 96,355 218,740
Output Tokens 8,213 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 18,073 0
Response Time (avg) 5.20s 10.05s
Response Time (max) 19.44s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 114.46s 221.13s
Parameters ~400B total (~17B active) ~35B total (~3B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#194 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
10.2s
Tokens
1,897 tok

#199 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair