Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.125. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) is faster at 5.04s vs 10.06s, with pass rates of 56.1% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#131
Total Output Tokens
25,438
Response Time (avg)
5.04s
Total Cost
$0.125
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.06s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 6.8x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #131 #136
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 56.1% 36.4%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.490 0.262
Total Cost $0.125 $0.019
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 96,346 218,731
Output Tokens 8,211 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 17,227 0
Response Time (avg) 5.04s 10.06s
Response Time (max) 19.44s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 110.88s 221.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#131 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
10.2s
Tokens
1,897 tok

#136 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair