Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Thinking (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.792. Qwen3.7 Flash is faster at 10.06s vs 84.96s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#150
Total Output Tokens
1,002,646
Response Time (avg)
84.96s
Total Cost
$0.792
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.06s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 43.2x less than Trinity Large Thinking (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking medium Release: 2026-07-28 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.0 6.1
Rank #150 #136
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.6 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 36.4%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 11.308 0.262
Total Cost $0.792 $0.019
Input Price $0.220 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $0.850 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,477 218,731
Output Tokens 148,823 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 853,823 0
Response Time (avg) 84.96s 10.06s
Response Time (max) 525.14s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 1869.16s 221.34s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#150 Trinity Large Thinking

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
75.9s
Tokens
19,401 tok

#136 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 7.5 10.0 66.7% 0 179.02s 7,248 7,413 351,155
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair