Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Thinking (medium) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.046 vs $0.792. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster at 1.75s vs 84.96s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#150
Total Output Tokens
1,002,646
Response Time (avg)
84.96s
Total Cost
$0.792
Rank
#137
Total Output Tokens
10,723
Response Time (avg)
1.75s
Total Cost
$0.046
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 17.4x less than Trinity Large Thinking (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking medium Release: 2026-07-28 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none Release: 2026-05-08
Score 6.0 6.1
Rank #150 #137
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.6 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 50.0%
Flaky tests 7 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 11.308 0.507
Total Cost $0.792 $0.046
Input Price $0.220 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Output Price $0.850 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,477 118,050
Output Tokens 148,823 10,723
Reasoning Tokens 853,823 0
Response Time (avg) 84.96s 1.75s
Response Time (max) 525.14s 16.25s
Response Time (total) 1869.16s 38.60s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#150 Trinity Large Thinking

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
75.9s
Tokens
19,401 tok

#137 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.5s
Tokens
727 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 7.5 10.0 66.7% 0 179.02s 7,248 7,413 351,155
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 938ms 8,128 666 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair