Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.5. Qwen3.6 27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.067 vs $0.247. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 10.65s vs 12.92s, with pass rates of 33.3% vs 45.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#154
Total Output Tokens
88,458
Response Time (avg)
12.92s
Total Cost
$0.247
Rank
#164
Total Output Tokens
16,155
Response Time (avg)
10.65s
Total Cost
$0.067
Recommended model Qwen3.6 27B

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.5 vs 5.7), while costing about 3.7x less than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.7 5.5
Rank #154 #164
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 33.3% 45.5%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.182 1.220
Total Cost $0.247 $0.067
Input Price $0.260 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $2.080 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 241,566 95,796
Output Tokens 88,458 16,155
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 12.92s 10.65s
Response Time (max) 212.63s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 284.21s 234.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#154 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
44.5s
Tokens
6,431 tok

#164 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 2.77s 7,913 693 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair