Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Laguna S 2.1 leads on average score with 4.5 vs 3.8. Laguna S 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.036. Laguna S 2.1 is faster at 11.67s vs 82.24s, with pass rates of 15.2% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelLaguna S 2.1It has the best score here (4.5), while responding about 7.0x faster than Qwen3.5-9B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02
Score 4.5 3.8
Rank #200 #214
Reliability 10.0 5.0
Consistency 8.8 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 15.2% 25.8%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.205 1.187
Total Cost $0.025 $0.036
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 125,598 17,070
Output Tokens 57,634 29,045
Reasoning Tokens 0 209,516
Response Time (avg) 11.67s 82.24s
Response Time (max) 200.52s 226.38s
Response Time (total) 256.80s 1315.88s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#200 Laguna S 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.6s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#214 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 3.4 9.7 0.0% 0 550ms 7,917 424 0
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair