Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

GLM 5 leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.4. GLM 5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.041 vs $0.059. GLM 5 is faster at 4.03s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 42.4%.

Recommended modelGLM 5It has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 14.5x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available GLM 5 GLM 5 none Release: 2026-02-12
Score 5.4 5.7
Rank #166 #148
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.4 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 42.4%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.451 0.263
Total Cost $0.059 $0.041
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 86,641 37,135
Output Tokens 97,298 1,989
Reasoning Tokens 242,297 0
Response Time (avg) 58.43s 4.03s
Response Time (max) 560.31s 11.07s
Response Time (total) 1285.48s 56.37s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#166 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

#148 GLM 5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
32.1s
Tokens
2,023 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718
GLM 5 4.0 7.8 11.1% 1 5.12s 7,256 428 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair