Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.6 Luna (high) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

Qwen3.7 Flash (high) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $0.509. GPT-5.6 Luna (high) is faster at 18.68s vs 39.77s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 72.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#52
Total Output Tokens
155,998
Response Time (avg)
18.68s
Total Cost
$0.509
Rank
#48
Total Output Tokens
359,703
Response Time (avg)
39.77s
Total Cost
$0.051
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 10.1x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna high Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #52 #48
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 72.7%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.780 0.387
Total Cost $0.509 $0.051
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 80,918 116,322
Output Tokens 5,088 12,332
Reasoning Tokens 150,910 347,371
Response Time (avg) 18.68s 39.77s
Response Time (max) 111.09s 431.47s
Response Time (total) 411.05s 875.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#52 GPT-5.6 Luna

high
Cost
$0.033
Time
34.2s
Tokens
5,484 tok

#48 Qwen3.7 Flash

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 4.7 55.6% 2 15.63s 7,302 510 17,746
Qwen3.7 Flash 8.2 9.7 66.7% 0 58.84s 7,893 503 62,350

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair