Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

OpenAI: GPT-5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Summary

GPT-5.5 leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.005 vs $0.231. GPT-5.5 is faster at 1.89s vs 3.58s, with pass rates of 54.0% vs 39.7%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-FlashIts score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.3), while costing about 55.7x less than GPT-5.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 none Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.3 6.1
Rank #109 #119
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 54.0% 39.7%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 2.302 0.075
Total Cost $0.231 $0.005
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,212 46,439
Output Tokens 1,971 4,276
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.89s 3.58s
Response Time (max) 5.56s 27.18s
Response Time (total) 39.64s 75.28s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#109 GPT-5.5

none
Cost
$0.090
Time
54.3s
Tokens
3,063 tok

#119 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,305 462 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair