Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 4.6. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.032 vs $0.340. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) is faster at 9.61s vs 68.27s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelQwen3 Coder Next (medium)It has the best score here (4.7), while costing about 10.8x less than MiniMax M2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium Release: 2026-02-12 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 4.6 4.7
Rank #205 #202
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.2 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 27.3%
Flaky tests 10 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.648 0.793
Total Cost $0.340 $0.032
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.900 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,561 148,194
Output Tokens 125,442 19,069
Reasoning Tokens 339,935 0
Response Time (avg) 68.27s 9.61s
Response Time (max) 251.36s 81.80s
Response Time (total) 955.75s 153.69s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#205 MiniMax M2.5

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#202 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 3.4 9.1 0.0% 0 188.58s 6,076 357 106,177
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair