Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Summary

Muse Spark 1.1 (high) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.588 vs $1.440. Muse Spark 1.1 (high) is faster at 29.16s vs 42.49s, with pass rates of 69.8% vs 73.0%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while costing about 2.5x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.8 7.7
Rank #41 #50
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.8% 73.0%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 61 63
Cost per result 11.997 5.235
Total Cost $1.440 $0.588
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 64,900 41,832
Output Tokens 3,577 26,187
Reasoning Tokens 316,055 251,028
Response Time (avg) 29.16s 42.49s
Response Time (max) 196.03s 168.16s
Response Time (total) 583.18s 892.30s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#41 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

#50 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

medium
Cost
$0.019
Time
48.7s
Tokens
6,034 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 114.48s 7,630 8,057 82,578

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair