Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.294 vs $1.440. Muse Spark 1.1 (high) is faster at 29.16s vs 30.70s, with pass rates of 69.8% vs 69.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Plus (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 4.9x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #41 #42
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.8% 69.8%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 61 63
Cost per result 11.997 0.831
Total Cost $1.440 $0.294
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.325 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $1.950 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 64,900 41,565
Output Tokens 3,577 1,853
Reasoning Tokens 316,055 141,973
Response Time (avg) 29.16s 30.70s
Response Time (max) 196.03s 201.68s
Response Time (total) 583.18s 613.99s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#41 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

#42 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
219.0s
Tokens
12,235 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair