Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Summary

Muse Spark 1.1 (high) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.317 vs $1.440. Muse Spark 1.1 (high) is faster at 29.16s vs 46.36s, with pass rates of 69.8% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.8 vs 7.8), while costing about 4.5x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #41 #47
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.8% 66.7%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 61 63
Cost per result 11.997 3.023
Total Cost $1.440 $0.317
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 64,900 42,097
Output Tokens 3,577 2,280
Reasoning Tokens 316,055 166,613
Response Time (avg) 29.16s 46.36s
Response Time (max) 196.03s 189.38s
Response Time (total) 583.18s 973.57s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#41 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

#47 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
76.7s
Tokens
4,355 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 6.2 8.7 33.3% 0 125.25s 7,630 308 58,682

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair