Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.9. Qwen3.5-27B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.536 vs $1.440. Muse Spark 1.1 (high) is faster at 29.16s vs 68.39s, with pass rates of 69.8% vs 73.0%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-27B (medium)It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 2.7x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.8 7.9
Rank #41 #39
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.8% 73.0%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 61 63
Cost per result 11.997 4.901
Total Cost $1.440 $0.536
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 64,900 42,164
Output Tokens 3,577 8,534
Reasoning Tokens 316,055 329,289
Response Time (avg) 29.16s 68.39s
Response Time (max) 196.03s 234.36s
Response Time (total) 583.18s 1436.24s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#41 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

#39 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair