Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.8. Claude Sonnet 5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.550 vs $1.440. Claude Sonnet 5 (medium) is faster at 9.94s vs 29.16s, with pass rates of 79.4% vs 69.8%.

Recommended modelClaude Sonnet 5 (medium)It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 2.6x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Sonnet 5 medium Release: 2026-06-30 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16
Score 7.9 7.8
Rank #40 #41
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 79.4% 69.8%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 63 61
Cost per result 3.662 11.997
Total Cost $0.550 $1.440
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 67,416 64,900
Output Tokens 34,012 3,577
Reasoning Tokens 7,673 316,055
Response Time (avg) 9.94s 29.16s
Response Time (max) 56.94s 196.03s
Response Time (total) 208.71s 583.18s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#40 Claude Sonnet 5

medium
Cost
$0.007
Time
6.4s
Tokens
832 tok

#41 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5 9.0 7.9 88.9% 1 17.28s 10,590 13,153 2,379
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair