Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Claude Sonnet 5 (medium) leads on average score with 8.3 vs 8.3. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.647 vs $0.922. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) is faster at 11.45s vs 12.52s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelMuse Spark 1.1 (low)It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (8.3), lower cost than Claude Sonnet 5 (medium), and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Sonnet 5 medium Release: 2026-06-30 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 low Release: 2026-07-16
Score 8.3 8.3
Rank #23 #24
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 69.7%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.760 4.975
Total Cost $0.922 $0.647
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,956 142,298
Output Tokens 52,333 10,847
Reasoning Tokens 10,874 99,467
Response Time (avg) 12.52s 11.45s
Response Time (max) 66.71s 54.15s
Response Time (total) 275.42s 251.92s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#23 Claude Sonnet 5

medium
Cost
$0.007
Time
6.4s
Tokens
832 tok

#24 Muse Spark 1.1

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
39.2s
Tokens
4,947 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5 9.0 7.9 88.9% 1 17.28s 10,590 13,153 2,379
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.34s 8,562 394 14,503

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair