Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Muse Spark 1.1 (low) vs Qwen3.8 27B (high)

Qwen3.8 27B (high) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.3. Local hardware cost was not measured, so cost comparisons are unavailable. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) is faster at 11.89s vs 167.89s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 77.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#45
Total Output Tokens
116,489
Response Time (avg)
11.89s
Total Cost
$0.673
Rank
#42
Total Output Tokens
656,635
Response Time (avg)
167.89s
Total Cost
N/A
Recommended model Muse Spark 1.1 (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.3 vs 8.4), while responding about 14.1x faster than Qwen3.8 27B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 low Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B high Release: 2026-08-14
Score 8.3 8.4
Rank #45 #42
Reliability 10.0 9.6
Consistency 8.5 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 77.3%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.173 N/A
Total Cost $0.673 N/A
Input Price $1.250 / 1M N/A
Output Price $4.250 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 141,878 100,179
Output Tokens 11,033 904
Reasoning Tokens 105,456 655,731
Response Time (avg) 11.89s 167.89s
Response Time (max) 54.15s 640.85s
Response Time (total) 261.69s 3693.54s
Parameters ~1T total (~50B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#45 Muse Spark 1.1

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
39.2s
Tokens
4,947 tok

#42 Qwen3.8 27B

high
Cost
N/A
Time
270.1s
Tokens
18,963 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.34s 8,562 394 14,503
Qwen3.8 27B 8.1 7.0 88.9% 1 248.62s 8,235 346 143,335

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair