Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 27B (high) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.7 vs 8.7. Qwen3.8 27B (high) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.298 vs $0.586. MiMo-V2.6-Pro (medium) is faster at 148.11s vs 166.34s, with pass rates of 78.3% vs 78.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-26

Compared models

Rank
#74
Total Output Tokens
677,080
Response Time (avg)
166.34s
Total Cost
~$0.298
Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
523,674
Response Time (avg)
148.11s
Total Cost
$0.586
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B (high)

It has the best score here (8.7), while costing about 2.0x less than MiMo-V2.6-Pro (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B high Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available MiMo-V2.6-Pro MiMo-V2.6-Pro medium Release: 2026-09-22
Score 8.7 8.7
Rank #74 #75
Reliability 9.7 9.5
Consistency 9.2 7.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 78.3% 78.3%
Flaky tests 2 7
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result ~1.751 4.182
Total Cost ~$0.298 $0.586
Input Price N/A $0.435 / 1M
Output Price N/A $0.870 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.004 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 348,967 298,476
Output Tokens 1,005 7,762
Reasoning Tokens 676,075 515,918
Response Time (avg) 166.34s 148.11s
Response Time (max) 640.85s 904.91s
Response Time (total) 3825.81s 3406.53s
Parameters 27.3B 1.02T total (42B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#74 Qwen3.8 27B

high
Cost
~$0.008
Time
270.1s
Tokens
18,963 tok

#75 MiMo-V2.6-Pro

medium
Cost
$0.012
Time
185.6s
Tokens
13,493 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 27B 8.1 7.0 88.9% 1 248.62s 8,235 346 143,335
MiMo-V2.6-Pro 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 150.44s 7,422 785 94,571

Switch Comparison Pair

GPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableSeed 2.1 TurbomediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableGPT-6 SollowvsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumGPT-6 SollowvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableMuse Spark 1.2lowvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableMuse Spark 1.2lowvsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumKimi K3.1 PromaxvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableKimi K3.1 PromaxvsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumGPT-6.1 TerranonevsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumMuse Spark 1.1lowvsMiMo-V2.6-Promedium