Navigate
Advertise here

Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (high)

Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.7. Qwen3.8 27B (high) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.298 vs $3.578. Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) is faster at 152.72s vs 166.34s, with pass rates of 84.1% vs 78.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-24

Compared models

Rank
#66
Total Output Tokens
300,622
Response Time (avg)
152.72s
Total Cost
$3.578
Rank
#69
Total Output Tokens
677,080
Response Time (avg)
166.34s
Total Cost
~$0.298
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.7 vs 8.7), while costing about 12.0x less than Kimi K3.1 Pro (max).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K3.1 Pro Kimi K3.1 Pro max Release: 2026-10-24 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B high Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available
Score 8.7 8.7
Rank #66 #69
Reliability 7.1 9.7
Consistency 8.6 9.2
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.1% 78.3%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 21.043 ~1.751
Total Cost $3.578 ~$0.298
Input Price $2.000 / 1M N/A
Output Price $10.000 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price $0.200 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 285,488 348,967
Output Tokens 9,091 1,005
Reasoning Tokens 291,531 676,075
Response Time (avg) 152.72s 166.34s
Response Time (max) 960.13s 640.85s
Response Time (total) 3512.51s 3825.81s
Parameters ~2.8T total (~104B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#66 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro

max
Cost
$0.193
Time
387.5s
Tokens
19,362 tok

#69 Qwen3.8 27B

high
Cost
~$0.008
Time
270.1s
Tokens
18,963 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K3.1 Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 71.94s 8,061 467 31,621
Qwen3.8 27B 8.1 7.0 88.9% 1 248.62s 8,235 346 143,335

Switch Comparison Pair

GPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailablevsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumMuse Spark 1.2lowvsKimi K3.1 PromaxSeed 2.1 TurbomediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3.1 PromaxDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsKimi K3.1 PromaxGPT-6 SollowvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableMuse Spark OpenmediumvsKimi K3.1 PromaxDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableMuse Spark 1.2lowvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableKimi K3.1 PromaxvsGPT-5.4mediumKimi K3.1 PromaxvsGPT-5.2medium