Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.418 vs $1.440. Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) is faster at 17.06s vs 29.16s, with pass rates of 65.1% vs 69.8%.

Recommended modelClaude Sonnet 4.6 (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 1.7x faster than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-17 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #44 #41
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.1 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.1% 69.8%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 63 61
Cost per result 10.904 11.997
Total Cost $1.418 $1.440
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 49,112 64,900
Output Tokens 54,703 3,577
Reasoning Tokens 29,970 316,055
Response Time (avg) 17.06s 29.16s
Response Time (max) 46.35s 196.03s
Response Time (total) 221.83s 583.18s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#44 Claude Sonnet 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#41 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.7 6.6 44.4% 1 33.29s 6,995 16,089 3,686
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair