Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Summary

Muse Spark 1.1 (high) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Claude Opus 4.8 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.270 vs $1.440. Claude Opus 4.8 (low) is faster at 10.83s vs 29.16s, with pass rates of 79.4% vs 69.8%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.8 (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while responding about 2.7x faster than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 low Release: 2026-05-28 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #51 #41
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 79.4% 69.8%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 63 61
Cost per result 8.466 11.997
Total Cost $1.270 $1.440
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 60,946 64,900
Output Tokens 31,771 3,577
Reasoning Tokens 6,831 316,055
Response Time (avg) 10.83s 29.16s
Response Time (max) 127.97s 196.03s
Response Time (total) 227.39s 583.18s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#51 Claude Opus 4.8

low
Cost
$0.031
Time
14.1s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#41 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 7.58s 10,590 3,637 809
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair