Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.7. LongCat 2.0 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.391 vs $0.738. Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) is faster at 44.65s vs 100.31s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Flash (medium)It has the best score here (6.9), while responding about 2.2x faster than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.7 6.9
Rank #96 #89
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 68.2%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.910 6.784
Total Cost $0.391 $0.738
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,909 129,041
Output Tokens 5,679 20,026
Reasoning Tokens 297,369 614,312
Response Time (avg) 100.31s 44.65s
Response Time (max) 560.39s 578.13s
Response Time (total) 2206.82s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

#89 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair