Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 4.9 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.016. GLM 4.7 Flash is faster at 9.15s vs 10.68s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-flashIt has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 9.6x less than GLM 4.7 Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash none Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.9 4.9
Rank #187 #185
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 34.9%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 0.256
Total Cost $0.002 $0.016
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.061 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 101,504
Output Tokens 14,903 22,992
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 9.15s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 97.15s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 137.18s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#187 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#185 GLM 4.7 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 2.54s 7,256 650 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair