- Rank
- #329
- Total Output Tokens
- 14,903
- Response Time (avg)
- 10.21s
- Total Cost
- $0.002
Ling 2.6 Flash vs MiniMax M2.5 (medium)
Ling 2.6 Flash leads on average score with 4.5 vs 4.3. Ling 2.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.359. Ling 2.6 Flash is faster at 10.21s vs 102.32s, with pass rates of 29.0% vs 42.0%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #340
- Total Output Tokens
- 290,496
- Response Time (avg)
- 102.32s
- Total Cost
- $0.359
Recommended model
Ling 2.6 Flash
It has the best score here (4.5), while costing about 258.3x less than MiniMax M2.5 (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash none | MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Rank | #329 | #340 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 6.8 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 29.0% | 42.0% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 9 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.024 | 7.104 |
| Total Cost | $0.002 | $0.359 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.270 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $1.080 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 114,384 | 188,239 |
| Output Tokens | 14,903 | 27,822 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 262,674 |
| Response Time (avg) | 10.21s | 102.32s |
| Response Time (max) | 36.03s | 600.81s |
| Response Time (total) | 214.31s | 1637.05s |
| Parameters | 104B total (7.4B active) | 230B total (10B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Weights available |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#329 Ling 2.6 Flash
none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#340 MiniMax M2.5
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 600.81s | 45,618 | 7,413 | 10,854 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7.9 | 6.3 | 83.3% | 2 | 20.82s | 612 | 286 | 45,344 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.4 | 9.1 | 0.0% | 0 | 188.58s | 6,076 | 357 | 106,177 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 50.0% | 2 | 83.19s | 119,959 | 16,687 | 18,834 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 66.7% | 2 | 7.48s | 6,584 | 266 | 3,835 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 158.88s | 368 | 14 | 45,372 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 33.3% | 1 | 6.63s | 492 | 25 | 1,686 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 621ms | 699 | 156 | 1,495 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 11.21s | 495 | 1,069 | 9,605 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.35s | 7,123 | 269 | 937 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 80.79s | 213 | 1,280 | 18,535 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 2.6 FlashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableMercury 2nonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumLing 2.6 FlashnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableMiniMax M2.5mediumvsgpt-oss-120bnoneGranite 4.2 8BnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumLing 2.6 FlashnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsMiniMax M2.5mediumKAT Coder AIR V2.5nonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsLing 2.6 FlashnoneGranite 4.2 8BhighvsLing 2.6 FlashnoneMercury 2.5nonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumMiniMax M2.5mediumvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree Available