Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2.5

Ling-2.6-flash leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.6. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.340. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 10.68s vs 68.27s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-flashIt has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 213.6x less than MiniMax M2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 4.9 4.6
Rank #184 #196
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 6.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 45.5%
Flaky tests 2 10
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 8.648
Total Cost $0.002 $0.340
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $0.900 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 142,561
Output Tokens 14,903 125,442
Reasoning Tokens 0 339,935
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 68.27s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 251.36s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 955.75s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#184 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#196 MiniMax M2.5

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
MiniMax M2.5 3.4 9.1 0.0% 0 188.58s 6,076 357 106,177

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair