Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Summary

Ling-2.6-flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash benchmark comparison: Ling-2.6-flash leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.4. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.001 vs $0.054. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 9.34s vs 35.10s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 33.3%.

Recommended model: Ling-2.6-flash - It has the best score here (5.0), while costing about 108.3x less than GLM 4.7 Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-06-04

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-01-19
Score 5.0 4.4
Rank #138 #158
Reliability 10.0 6.7
Consistency 9.2 6.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 33.3%
Flaky tests 2 8
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.005 1.337
Total Cost $0.001 $0.054
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 40,718 37,206
Output Tokens 2,878 43,754
Reasoning Tokens 0 89,079
Response Time (avg) 9.34s 35.10s
Response Time (max) 35.34s 174.55s
Response Time (total) 177.48s 456.24s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#138 Ling-2.6-flash

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#158 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
186.2s
Tokens
12,112 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 6.8 8.1 58.3% 1 11.81s 726 573 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.7 5.9 41.7% 2 14.95s 555 1,122 6,110
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.2 7.4 11.1% 1 55.33s 3,106 4,981 22,387
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 35.34s 20,818 1,069 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 2.8 2.1 33.3% 1 65.57s 17,185 2,585 20,648
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 8.48s 8,004 246 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 1.51s 7,107 584 2,755
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.95s 810 24 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.5 4.4 33.3% 2 174.55s 643 33,000 25,394
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.45s 540 109 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.6 9.7 0.0% 0 18.14s 318 18 2,138
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 5.52s 732 81 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 6.2 5.8 66.7% 1 2.97s 636 388 2,181
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 6.51s 729 151 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 12.93s 521 781 5,255
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 18.80s 7,324 229 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.95s 6,949 224 1,014
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.06s 222 15 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 11.13s 186 71 1,197

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Ling-2.6-1TnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMercury 2nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumQwen3.5-9BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumQwen3.6 35B A3BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMiMo-V2-FlashnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsMistral Small 4mediumTrinity Large PreviewnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumGPT-5.4 NanononevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumGranite 4.1 8BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGPT-4o-mininonevsGLM 4.7 Flashmedium