- Rank
- #329
- Total Output Tokens
- 14,903
- Response Time (avg)
- 10.21s
- Total Cost
- $0.002
Ling 2.6 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash (medium)
Ling 2.6 Flash leads on average score with 4.5 vs 4.2. Ling 2.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.193. Ling 2.6 Flash is faster at 10.21s vs 150.90s, with pass rates of 29.0% vs 30.4%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #341
- Total Output Tokens
- 464,375
- Response Time (avg)
- 150.90s
- Total Cost
- $0.193
Recommended model
Ling 2.6 Flash
It has the best score here (4.5), while costing about 138.9x less than GLM 4.7 Flash (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash none | GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Rank | #329 | #341 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 7.1 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 29.0% | 30.4% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 8 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.024 | 4.822 |
| Total Cost | $0.002 | $0.193 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.061 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 114,384 | 228,711 |
| Output Tokens | 14,903 | 42,254 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 422,121 |
| Response Time (avg) | 10.21s | 150.90s |
| Response Time (max) | 36.03s | 1539.97s |
| Response Time (total) | 214.31s | 2414.33s |
| Parameters | 104B total (7.4B active) | 30B total (3B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#329 Ling 2.6 Flash
none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#341 GLM 4.7 Flash
medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 186.2s
- Tokens
- 12,112 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.9 | 9.6 | 0.0% | 0 | 399.20s | 149,607 | 0 | 44,841 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 4.7 | 5.9 | 41.7% | 2 | 14.95s | 555 | 1,122 | 6,110 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.2 | 7.4 | 11.1% | 1 | 55.33s | 3,106 | 4,981 | 22,387 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 2.9 | 6.0 | 16.7% | 1 | 802.77s | 59,030 | 2,585 | 305,678 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.51s | 7,107 | 584 | 2,755 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.5 | 4.4 | 33.3% | 2 | 96.74s | 696 | 31,500 | 28,565 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.6 | 9.7 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.14s | 318 | 18 | 2,138 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 6.2 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 2.97s | 636 | 388 | 2,181 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 12.93s | 521 | 781 | 5,255 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.95s | 6,949 | 224 | 1,014 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 11.13s | 186 | 71 | 1,197 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
gpt-oss-120bnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 2.6 FlashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableLing 2.6 FlashnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableMercury 2.5nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 2.6 FlashnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumMercury 2nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsLing 2.6 FlashnoneGranite 4.2 8BhighvsLing 2.6 FlashnoneGranite 4.2 8BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 2.6 FlashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumKAT Coder AIR V2.5nonevsGLM 4.7 Flashmedium