Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Ling-2.6-flash leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.3. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.166. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 10.68s vs 142.59s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-flashIt has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 104.3x less than GLM 4.7 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.9 4.3
Rank #184 #200
Reliability 10.0 7.8
Consistency 9.3 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 31.8%
Flaky tests 2 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 4.147
Total Cost $0.002 $0.166
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.061 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 79,051
Output Tokens 14,903 43,754
Reasoning Tokens 0 374,109
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 142.59s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 1539.97s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 1996.21s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#184 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#200 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
186.2s
Tokens
12,112 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.2 7.4 11.1% 1 55.33s 3,106 4,981 22,387

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair