- Rank
- #318
- Total Output Tokens
- 661,367
- Response Time (avg)
- 235.35s
- Total Cost
- $0.161
Granite 4.2 8B (high) vs Ling 2.6 Flash
Granite 4.2 8B (high) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 4.5. Ling 2.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.161. Ling 2.6 Flash is faster at 10.21s vs 235.35s, with pass rates of 37.7% vs 29.0%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #329
- Total Output Tokens
- 14,903
- Response Time (avg)
- 10.21s
- Total Cost
- $0.002
Recommended model
Ling 2.6 Flash
Its score stays close to the best score here (4.5 vs 4.7), while costing about 115.9x less than Granite 4.2 8B (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B high | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Rank | #318 | #329 |
| Reliability | 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Consistency | 6.4 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 37.7% | 29.0% |
| Flaky tests | 10 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 2.751 | 0.024 |
| Total Cost | $0.161 | $0.002 |
| Input Price | $0.060 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 282,658 | 114,384 |
| Output Tokens | 198,563 | 14,903 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 462,804 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 235.35s | 10.21s |
| Response Time (max) | 685.87s | 36.03s |
| Response Time (total) | 5413.09s | 214.31s |
| Parameters | 8B | 104B total (7.4B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#318 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B
high
Provider returned error
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.2s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#329 Ling 2.6 Flash
none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 223.46s | 239,380 | 17,480 | 31,672 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 6.9 | 5.8 | 75.0% | 2 | 205.31s | 507 | 8,350 | 12,250 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.8 | 4.3 | 33.3% | 2 | 515.34s | 7,047 | 42,438 | 154,749 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.0 | 6.8 | 33.3% | 1 | 570.43s | 18,410 | 16,478 | 60,329 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.8 | 5.8 | 33.3% | 1 | 56.55s | 6,779 | 1,368 | 3,999 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 167.15s | 498 | 81,004 | 122,013 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 16.37s | 534 | 5,762 | 5,800 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 87.47s | 483 | 2,191 | 13,223 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 202.69s | 467 | 14,348 | 19,827 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.08s | 8,331 | 893 | 4,841 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 252.49s | 222 | 8,251 | 34,101 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Granite 4.2 8BhighvsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableNorth Mini CodenoneFree AvailablevsGranite 4.2 8BhighGranite 4.2 8BhighvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGranite 4.2 8BhighvsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BhighvsMercury 2.5 PreviewnoneDeepSeek V3.2nonevsGranite 4.2 8BhighGranite 4.2 8BhighvsGPT-5.4 NanononeLing 2.6 FlashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableLing 2.6 FlashnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BhighvsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BhighvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BhighvsGLM 4.7 Flashnone