- Rank
- #329
- Total Output Tokens
- 14,903
- Response Time (avg)
- 10.21s
- Total Cost
- $0.002
Ling 2.6 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (medium)
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 4.5. Ling 2.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.129. Ling 2.6 Flash is faster at 10.21s vs 81.93s, with pass rates of 29.0% vs 47.8%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #315
- Total Output Tokens
- 766,130
- Response Time (avg)
- 81.93s
- Total Cost
- $0.129
Recommended model
Ling 2.6 Flash
Its score stays close to the best score here (4.5 vs 4.7), while costing about 92.9x less than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash none | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning medium Free Available |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| Rank | #329 | #315 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 9.8 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 5.8 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 29.0% | 47.8% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 12 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.024 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.002 | $0.129 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.060 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.160 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 114,384 | 195,780 |
| Output Tokens | 14,903 | 167,746 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 598,384 |
| Response Time (avg) | 10.21s | 81.93s |
| Response Time (max) | 36.03s | 437.11s |
| Response Time (total) | 214.31s | 1884.31s |
| Parameters | 104B total (7.4B active) | 30B total (3B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Weights available |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#329 Ling 2.6 Flash
none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#315 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 130.5s
- Tokens
- 6,750 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 341.79s | 69,450 | 2,044 | 3,645 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 6.9 | 7.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.34s | 696 | 6,904 | 20,862 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 4.4 | 5.1 | 33.3% | 2 | 285.47s | 7,623 | 78,065 | 297,359 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 6.2 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 136.91s | 98,571 | 15,769 | 112,376 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 3.7 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 2 | 23.24s | 7,944 | 4,195 | 30,097 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 74.73s | 798 | 54,657 | 91,174 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 5.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.36s | 516 | 3,127 | 3,157 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 8.5 | 6.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 3.75s | 723 | 531 | 4,404 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 4.2 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 10.49s | 726 | 1,170 | 18,195 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.92s | 8,526 | 154 | 2,518 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 44.02s | 207 | 1,130 | 14,597 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Mercury 2.5 PreviewnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableNorth Mini CodenoneFree AvailablevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BhighvsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableLing 2.6 FlashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableLing 2.6 FlashnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneDeepSeek V3.2nonevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsGPT-5.4 NanononeNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableLing 2.6 FlashnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsHy4 previewnone