Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.3. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.369. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.18s vs 6.01s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 36.4%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0Its score stays close to the best score here (6.3 vs 6.5), while costing about 8.4x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Release: 2026-07-21 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.5 6.3
Rank #104 #117
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 36.4%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.074 0.627
Total Cost $0.369 $0.044
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,818 108,743
Output Tokens 11,677 9,372
Reasoning Tokens 121,611 0
Response Time (avg) 6.01s 5.18s
Response Time (max) 49.03s 48.38s
Response Time (total) 132.30s 113.95s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.015
Time
16.4s
Tokens
5,971 tok

#117 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 8.37s 8,136 452 25,999
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair