Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

The average score is effectively tied at 6.3 vs 6.3. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.163. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.18s vs 75.38s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 36.4%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0It has the best score here (6.3), while costing about 3.7x less than Gemma 4 31B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.3 6.3
Rank #110 #111
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 36.4%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.044 0.627
Total Cost $0.163 $0.044
Input Price $0.220 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $0.550 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,992 108,743
Output Tokens 34,468 9,372
Reasoning Tokens 223,278 0
Response Time (avg) 75.38s 5.18s
Response Time (max) 437.40s 48.38s
Response Time (total) 1507.52s 113.95s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#110 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

#111 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair