Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Gemma 4 31B (medium) leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.1. Gemma 4 31B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.107 vs $0.122. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is faster at 13.56s vs 75.38s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelGemma 4 31B (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.3 6.1
Rank #107 #122
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 43.9%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.044 1.636
Total Cost $0.107 $0.122
Input Price $0.120 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $0.370 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,992 94,468
Output Tokens 34,468 51,487
Reasoning Tokens 223,278 0
Response Time (avg) 75.38s 13.56s
Response Time (max) 437.40s 206.05s
Response Time (total) 1507.52s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#107 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

#122 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair