Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

LongCat 2.0 leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.249. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) is faster at 5.04s vs 5.18s, with pass rates of 36.4% vs 56.1%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0It has the best score here (6.3), while costing about 5.7x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Release: 2026-07-09
Score 6.3 6.2
Rank #111 #117
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.4% 56.1%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.627 2.490
Total Cost $0.044 $0.249
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,743 96,346
Output Tokens 9,372 8,211
Reasoning Tokens 0 17,227
Response Time (avg) 5.18s 5.04s
Response Time (max) 48.38s 19.44s
Response Time (total) 113.95s 110.88s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

#117 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
10.2s
Tokens
1,897 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair