Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

LongCat 2.0 leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.837. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.18s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 36.4% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0It has the best score here (6.3), while costing about 19.1x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.3 6.2
Rank #111 #119
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.4% 66.7%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.627 9.130
Total Cost $0.044 $0.837
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,743 130,388
Output Tokens 9,372 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 0 786,040
Response Time (avg) 5.18s 112.47s
Response Time (max) 48.38s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 113.95s 2474.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

#119 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair