Navigate
Advertise here

LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.4 vs 6.3. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.104 vs $1.249. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 8.50s vs 111.54s, with pass rates of 42.0% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#211
Total Output Tokens
17,473
Response Time (avg)
8.50s
Total Cost
$0.104
Rank
#212
Total Output Tokens
921,628
Response Time (avg)
111.54s
Total Cost
$1.249
Recommended model LongCat 2.0

It has the best score here (6.4), while costing about 12.0x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.4 6.3
Rank #211 #212
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 7.5
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.0% 65.2%
Flaky tests 3 7
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.298 10.505
Total Cost $0.104 $1.249
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.163 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 276,199 378,048
Output Tokens 17,473 56,477
Reasoning Tokens 0 865,151
Response Time (avg) 8.50s 111.54s
Response Time (max) 81.77s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 195.60s 2565.38s
Parameters 1.6T total (48B active) 35B total (3B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#211 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

#212 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair