Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 (low) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 6.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $1.253. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) is faster at 2.25s vs 10.13s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 86.4%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.5 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Release: 2026-04-24
Score 6.7 9.3
Rank #95 #9
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 86.4%
Flaky tests 5 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.201 6.594
Total Cost $0.145 $1.253
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $30.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,622 80,058
Output Tokens 15,302 5,378
Reasoning Tokens 24,971 23,040
Response Time (avg) 2.25s 10.13s
Response Time (max) 13.50s 56.19s
Response Time (total) 49.58s 222.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Cost
$0.008
Time
7.7s
Tokens
3,056 tok

#9 GPT-5.5

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
37.0s
Tokens
2,339 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair