Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.187. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) is faster at 2.25s vs 33.92s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.7 vs 6.9), while responding about 15.0x faster than MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.7 6.9
Rank #95 #88
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 66.7%
Flaky tests 5 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.201 3.218
Total Cost $0.145 $0.187
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,622 139,883
Output Tokens 15,302 15,521
Reasoning Tokens 24,971 130,992
Response Time (avg) 2.25s 33.92s
Response Time (max) 13.50s 197.54s
Response Time (total) 49.58s 746.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Cost
$0.008
Time
7.7s
Tokens
3,056 tok

#88 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair