Navigate
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (low) vs Qwen3.6 27B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.3 vs 6.3. Qwen3.6 27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.147 vs $0.183. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (low) is faster at 4.79s vs 12.71s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 47.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#214
Total Output Tokens
39,912
Response Time (avg)
4.79s
Total Cost
$0.183
Rank
#213
Total Output Tokens
20,816
Response Time (avg)
12.71s
Total Cost
$0.147
Recommended model Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (low)

It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 2.7x faster than Qwen3.6 27B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.3 6.3
Rank #214 #213
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.9 7.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 47.8%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.521 1.874
Total Cost $0.183 $0.147
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $3.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 275,779 250,919
Output Tokens 14,401 20,816
Reasoning Tokens 25,511 0
Response Time (avg) 4.79s 12.71s
Response Time (max) 53.91s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 110.24s 292.29s
Parameters ~150B total (~10B active) 27B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#214 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

low
Cost
$0.007
Time
7.5s
Tokens
2,669 tok

#213 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 917ms 8,126 464 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair