Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Ling 3.0 Flash leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.6. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.044. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.46s vs 36.78s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelLing 3.0 FlashIt has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 10.6x faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash none Release: 2026-04-24 Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available
Score 5.6 5.7
Rank #158 #149
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.5 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 27.3%
Flaky tests 4 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.917 0.000
Total Cost $0.044 $0.000
Input Price $0.098 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.196 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 240,221 124,176
Output Tokens 100,727 12,783
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 36.78s 3.46s
Response Time (max) 247.27s 17.51s
Response Time (total) 809.09s 76.06s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#158 DeepSeek V4 Flash

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
157.6s
Tokens
11,297 tok

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair