Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Lite vs MiMo-V2.5 (medium)

MiMo-V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 6.4 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.066 vs $0.104. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.37s vs 46.28s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-04

Rank
#183
Total Output Tokens
14,744
Response Time (avg)
4.37s
Total Cost
$0.066
Rank
#178
Total Output Tokens
327,048
Response Time (avg)
46.28s
Total Cost
$0.104
Recommended model Seed-2.0-Lite

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.4), while costing about 1.6x less than MiMo-V2.5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.2 6.4
Rank #183 #178
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 68.2%
Flaky tests 3 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.813 3.575
Total Cost $0.066 $0.104
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,206 105,456
Output Tokens 14,744 7,108
Reasoning Tokens 0 319,940
Response Time (avg) 4.37s 46.28s
Response Time (max) 44.58s 316.27s
Response Time (total) 96.20s 1018.12s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 310B total (15B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#183 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#178 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair