Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Cobuddy vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

The average score is effectively tied at 4.7 vs 4.7. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.032. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) is faster at 9.61s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelQwen3 Coder Next (medium)It has the best score here (4.7), while responding about 4.2x faster than Cobuddy (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 4.7 4.7
Rank #203 #202
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.2 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 27.3%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.793
Total Cost $0.000 $0.032
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 148,194
Output Tokens 1,677 19,069
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 9.61s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 81.80s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 153.69s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#203 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#202 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair