Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 4.8. Trinity Large Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.061. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 5.52s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 35B A3BIt has the strongest score in this comparison (5.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 4.8 5.3
Rank #179 #157
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 31.8%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 1.496
Total Cost $0.008 $0.061
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 93,979
Output Tokens 2,169 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#157 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair