Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

MiniMax M2.7 (medium) vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.0. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.061 vs $0.163. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 41.28s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#186
Total Output Tokens
137,594
Response Time (avg)
41.28s
Total Cost
$0.163
Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B

It has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 2.7x less than MiniMax M2.7 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax M2.7 medium Release: 2026-03-18 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.0 5.3
Rank #186 #175
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.6 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 31.8%
Flaky tests 9 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.906 1.496
Total Cost $0.163 $0.061
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,518 93,979
Output Tokens 18,558 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 119,036 0
Response Time (avg) 41.28s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 196.21s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 866.81s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#186 MiniMax M2.7

medium
Cost
$0.022
Time
22.8s
Tokens
9,250 tok

#175 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 5.7 9.1 33.3% 0 101.89s 2,961 1,231 38,841
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair