Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Trinity Large Preview leads on average score with 4.8 vs 3.8. Trinity Large Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.036. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 82.24s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelTrinity Large PreviewIt has the best score here (4.8), while costing about 4.6x less than Qwen3.5-9B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02
Score 4.8 3.8
Rank #192 #214
Reliability 10.0 5.0
Consistency 8.9 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 25.8%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 1.187
Total Cost $0.008 $0.036
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 17,070
Output Tokens 2,169 29,045
Reasoning Tokens 0 209,516
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 82.24s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 226.38s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 1315.88s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#192 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#214 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair