Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.6 Flash (medium)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 6.9. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.661 vs $0.738. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 8.12s vs 44.65s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#71
Total Output Tokens
19,362
Response Time (avg)
8.12s
Total Cost
$0.661
Rank
#93
Total Output Tokens
634,338
Response Time (avg)
44.65s
Total Cost
$0.738
Recommended model Claude Sonnet 4.6

It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 5.5x faster than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.3 6.9
Rank #71 #93
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 6.784
Total Cost $0.661 $0.738
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 129,041
Output Tokens 19,362 20,026
Reasoning Tokens 0 614,312
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 44.65s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 578.13s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#93 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair