指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
210/210
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #181 | Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta medium | X AI | 9.8 | 4.8 | $5.599 | 2/2 | 3.52s |
| #10 | GPT-5.5 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.0 | $4.137 | 2/2 | 3.36s |
| #17 | Claude Fable 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.6 | $3.478 | 2/2 | 5.90s |
| #33 | Kimi K3 max | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 8.0 | $3.112 | 2/2 | 7.66s |
| #43 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.7 | $3.059 | 2/2 | 2.43s |
| #163 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 9.8 | 5.3 | $2.310 | 2/2 | 64.0s | |
| #41 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 9.8 | 7.8 | $2.077 | 2/2 | 2.78s |
| #40 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.8 | $2.057 | 2/2 | 2.61s |
| #143 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 7.3 | 5.6 | $2.044 | 1/2 | 23.3s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.5 | $1.976 | 2/2 | 3.35s | |
| #14 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.8 | $1.931 | 2/2 | 3.32s |
| #22 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 9.8 | 8.3 | $1.928 | 2/2 | 6.06s |
| #12 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 9.8 | 8.9 | $1.707 | 2/2 | 6.23s |
| #27 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 6.4 | 8.1 | $1.694 | 1/2 | 7.81s |
| #58 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.4 | $1.627 | 2/2 | 19.7s |