指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
216/216
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #55 | Nemotron 3 Ultra medium | NVIDIA | 9.8 | 7.5 | $0.774 | 2/2 | 6.35s |
| #60 | GPT-5.4 Mini medium | OpenAI | 9.8 | 7.5 | $0.756 | 2/2 | 2.13s |
| #137 | Grok 4.20 Beta medium | X AI | 9.8 | 6.0 | $0.750 | 2/2 | 4.89s |
| #94 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.7 | $0.746 | 2/2 | 7.50s |
| #3 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.6 | $0.742 | 2/2 | 4.04s | |
| #56 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 9.9 | 7.5 | $0.740 | 2/2 | 5.39s |
| #89 | Qwen3.6 Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.9 | $0.738 | 2/2 | 6.05s |
| #140 | Mimo V2 Omni medium | Xiaomi | 8.3 | 5.9 | $0.683 | 1/2 | 4.99s |
| #43 | GPT-5.6 Terra medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.676 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #67 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 6.5 | 7.3 | $0.661 | 1/2 | 1.96s |
| #27 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 7.3 | 8.3 | $0.647 | 1/2 | 5.42s |
| #110 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.646 | 2/2 | 1.49s | |
| #28 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 9.8 | 8.2 | $0.643 | 2/2 | 2.62s | |
| #12 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 9.9 | 9.1 | $0.642 | 2/2 | 2.70s | |
| #111 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.621 | 2/2 | 1.52s |