指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #133 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.270 | 2/2 | 12.8s |
| #62 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.213 | 2/2 | 3.11s |
| #14 | GPT-6 Astra low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $2.160 | 2/2 | 2.65s |
| #25 | Claude Opus 5.5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.133 | 2/2 | 21.3s |
| #245 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $2.126 | 2/2 | 2.61s |
| #45 | Muse Spark Open xhigh | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.081 | 2/2 | 23.5s |
| #378 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 0.7 | 0.5 | $2.044 | 1/2 | 23.3s | |
| #71 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.042 | 2/2 | 7.48s |
| #55 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.018 | 2/2 | 5.43s |
| #159 | Grok 4.7 low | X AI | 0.8 | 0.7 | $1.933 | 1/2 | 6.19s |
| #2 | Gemini 3.8 Flash high | 1.0 | 1.0 | $1.927 | 2/2 | 4.73s | |
| #43 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.892 | 2/2 | 7.66s |
| #40 | Muse Spark 1.3 high | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.891 | 1/2 | 14.7s |
| #59 | Pareto 26.9 default | Unbiased | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.864 | 2/2 | 3.82s |
| #329 | Hy4 preview low | Tencent | 1.0 | 0.5 | $1.844 | 2/2 | 77.7s |