指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #400 | Mercury 2.5 none | Inception | 0.5 | 0.4 | $0.026 | 0/2 | 493ms |
| #369 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.027 | 1/2 | 888ms |
| #297 | Qwen3.7 Flash none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.028 | 1/2 | 892ms |
| #283 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.029 | 0/2 | 36.9s |
| #292 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.030 | 2/2 | 7.63s |
| #323 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.031 | 1/2 | 690ms | |
| #310 | Gemma 4 31B none | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.031 | 1/2 | 2.84s | |
| #147 | GPT-6 Luna low | OpenAI | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.033 | 1/2 | 17.4s |
| #406 | Laguna M.1 medium | Poolside | 1.0 | 0.4 | $0.033 | 2/2 | 4.30s |
| #394 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 0.7 | 0.4 | $0.033 | 1/2 | 551ms |
| #249 | Mercury 2.5 medium | Inception | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.034 | 1/2 | 1.07s |
| #335 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.036 | 0/2 | 75.8s |
| #392 | Granite 4.2 8B none | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.037 | 0/2 | 79.5s |
| #221 | GLM 5.3 Flash low | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.038 | 2/2 | 1.65s |
| #207 | Mercury 2.5 Preview medium | Inception | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.039 | 2/2 | 1.35s |