领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
316/316
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #266 | Laguna S 2.1 low | Poolside | 3.0 | 5.0 | $0.082 | 0/3 | 2.46s |
| #133 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 2.9 | 7.0 | $0.078 | 0/3 | 22.9s |
| #225 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 3.0 | 5.6 | $0.077 | 0/3 | 7.28s |
| #206 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 5.3 | 5.9 | $0.076 | 1/3 | 507ms |
| #205 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 5.3 | 6.0 | $0.073 | 1/3 | 873ms |
| #169 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 7.7 | 6.6 | $0.073 | 2/3 | 1.24s |
| #108 | GPT-5.6 Luna medium | OpenAI | 2.9 | 7.4 | $0.072 | 0/3 | 18.5s |
| #74 | Qwen3.8 27B low | Qwen | 5.3 | 7.9 | ~$0.071 | 1/3 | 60.8s |
| #279 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 none | Kwaipilot | 3.0 | 4.8 | $0.070 | 0/3 | 8.33s |
| #283 | Grok 4.1 Fast medium | X AI | 5.8 | 4.7 | $0.069 | 1/3 | 121.8s |
| #242 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro none | Xiaomi | 3.0 | 5.4 | $0.068 | 0/3 | 1.79s |
| #171 | Laguna XS 2.1 medium | Poolside | 3.5 | 6.5 | $0.068 | 0/3 | 67.5s |
| #119 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 medium | DeepSeek | 2.9 | 7.3 | $0.066 | 0/3 | 203.1s |
| #183 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 3.0 | 6.2 | $0.066 | 0/3 | 1.12s |
| #142 | Qwen3.7 Flash medium | Qwen | 2.9 | 6.9 | $0.065 | 0/3 | 38.0s |