数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
442/442
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #169 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 0.6 | 0.7 | $3.787 | 1/2 | 2.27s |
| #105 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.636 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #95 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 0.7 | 0.8 | $3.490 | 1/2 | 12.3s |
| #116 | Claude Fable 5.1 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.471 | 2/2 | 6.30s |
| #131 | Muse Wonder high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.426 | 2/2 | 7.09s |
| #93 | Kimi K3 max | Moonshot AI | 0.7 | 0.8 | $3.409 | 1/2 | 16.7s |
| #203 | Grok 4.7 xhigh | X AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $3.398 | 2/2 | 7.50s |
| #32 | Muse Wonder medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.397 | 2/2 | 6.12s |
| #264 | Claude Fable 5.1 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $3.395 | 2/2 | 4.71s |
| #36 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.306 | 2/2 | 16.4s |
| #209 | Ember-1 max | Fireworks | 0.6 | 0.7 | $3.264 | 1/2 | 39.8s |
| #159 | Claude Fable 5.1 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $3.197 | 2/2 | 4.47s |
| #207 | Grok 4.7 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $3.037 | 2/2 | 8.65s |
| #124 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.996 | 2/2 | 6.29s |
| #253 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $2.961 | 2/2 | 7.37s |