数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 测试正确 ↑.
442/442
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #162 | LongCat 2.0 high | Meituan | 0.4 | 0.7 | $0.778 | 0/2 | 11.0s |
| #174 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.7 | $1.021 | 0/2 | 37.3s |
| #179 | MiMo-V2.5 medium | Xiaomi | 0.3 | 0.7 | $0.130 | 0/2 | 6.33s |
| #293 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.159 | 0/2 | 21.4s |
| #297 | Dots 3 Note Preview medium | Dots Studio | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 78.5s |
| #359 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning medium | NVIDIA | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.195 | 0/2 | 23.2s |
| #362 | Granite 4.2 8B high | IBM Granite | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.111 | 0/2 | 56.5s |
| #369 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning low | NVIDIA | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.175 | 0/2 | 31.3s |
| #375 | Ring 2.6 1t default | Inclusionai | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.026 | 0/2 | 45.9s |
| #380 | Granite 4.2 8B none | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.037 | 0/2 | 1.05s |
| #384 | MiniMax M2.5 medium | Minimax | 0.5 | 0.4 | $0.440 | 0/2 | 7.48s |
| #388 | Mercury 2.5 none | Inception | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.026 | 0/2 | 885ms |
| #390 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.4 | $0.106 | 0/2 | 87.3s |
| #396 | Granite 4.1 8b default | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.007 | 0/2 | 575ms |
| #398 | Xing4.0 29b A4b medium | Xingchen AGI | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 147.5s |