数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 测试正确 ↑.
451/451
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #34 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 max | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $8.557 | 2/2 | 16.1s |
| #35 | Qwen3.8 MAX medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.181 | 2/2 | 8.72s |
| #36 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 low | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.355 | 2/2 | 1.71s |
| #37 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.306 | 2/2 | 16.4s |
| #38 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.318 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #39 | Claude Haiku 5.5 xhigh | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.140 | 2/2 | 3.65s |
| #40 | Muse Spark 1.3 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.891 | 2/2 | 7.01s |
| #41 | Muse Wonder low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.637 | 2/2 | 4.27s |
| #42 | Pareto default | Unbiased | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.520 | 2/2 | 2.57s |
| #43 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.892 | 2/2 | 33.7s |
| #44 | Muse Wonder minimal | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.639 | 2/2 | 3.31s |
| #45 | Muse Spark Open xhigh | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.081 | 2/2 | 16.4s |
| #46 | Gemini 3.5 Flash low | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.752 | 2/2 | 1.81s | |
| #47 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.096 | 2/2 | 10.5s |
| #48 | Muse Spark 1.3 medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.712 | 2/2 | 8.75s |