综合 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 综合 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 响应时间（平均） ↑.
451/451
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 综合 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #377 | Laguna S 2.1 low | Poolside | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.108 | 0/2 | 412.5s |
| #389 | Granite 4.2 8B none | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.037 | 0/2 | 424.3s |
| #197 | Gemma 4 31B medium | 0.3 | 0.7 | $0.144 | 0/2 | 433.1s | |
| #314 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL none | NVIDIA | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.040 | 0/2 | 451.9s |
| #201 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 0.7 | 0.7 | $1.594 | 1/2 | 458.6s |
| #160 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 0.6 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 1/2 | 492.9s | |
| #252 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.716 | 0/2 | 512.8s |
| #325 | North Mini Code medium | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 554.9s |
| #371 | Granite 4.2 8B high | IBM Granite | 0.5 | 0.5 | $0.111 | 0/2 | 570.4s |
| #177 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.7 | $1.021 | 0/2 | 584.1s |
| #116 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.8 | $1.135 | 1/2 | 595.2s |
| #358 | Laguna S 2.1 high | Poolside | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.145 | 0/2 | 702.3s |
| #394 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.193 | 0/2 | 802.8s |
| #328 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.105 | 1/2 | 813.7s |
| #229 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 0.3 | 0.7 | $0.834 | 0/2 | 817.6s |