综合 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 综合 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
311/311
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 综合 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #303 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 1.5 | 3.8 | $0.008 | 0/1 | 3.33s |
| #276 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 1.5 | 4.8 | $0.008 | 0/1 | 8.91s |
| #267 | Nemotron 3 Super none | NVIDIA | 3.0 | 4.8 | $0.008 | 0/2 | 18.2s |
| #249 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 3.0 | 5.2 | $0.009 | 0/2 | 291.1s |
| #287 | Laguna M.1 none | Poolside | 1.5 | 4.4 | $0.009 | 0/1 | 4.32s |
| #307 | gpt-oss-120b none | OpenAI | 1.5 | 3.7 | $0.010 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #263 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 5.0 | $0.010 | 0/2 | 6.32s |
| #260 | Mercury 2.5 Preview low | Inception | 3.0 | 5.0 | $0.011 | 0/2 | 4.77s |
| #239 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 none | DeepSeek | 3.7 | 5.4 | $0.011 | 0/2 | 202.4s |
| #253 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 3.0 | 5.1 | $0.012 | 0/2 | 298.2s |
| #223 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 3.0 | 5.6 | $0.015 | 0/2 | 37.2s | |
| #206 | GLM 5.3 Flash low | Z.ai | 3.8 | 5.9 | $0.015 | 0/2 | 54.7s |
| #294 | Laguna Xs.2 medium | Poolside | 1.5 | 4.1 | $0.015 | 0/1 | 15.9s |
| #244 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 6.5 | 5.3 | $0.016 | 1/2 | 23.8s |
| #275 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 3.0 | 4.8 | $0.016 | 0/2 | 50.2s |